Archive for November, 2007

Insurers agree to more transparent physician ratings

Just weeks after it was signed, Cigna's agreement in New York to modify its physician ranking tool is set to have a ripple effect across the country.

Aetna and Empire BlueCross BlueShield, a WellPoint company, have signed similar agreements with New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo's office. Aetna signed its deal on Nov. 13, while Empire followed the next day.

Aetna immediately pledged to apply the terms of its New York agreement to all of its tiered networks nationwide. Cigna made a similar pledge the same day Aetna did. WellPoint said it is not ready to make such a promise.

Under their separate deals, all three plans have agreed to make the basis of their physician ranking programs transparent to members, base those rankings on nationally recognized quality standards and submit their programs to outside evaluation.

Cuomo began looking into health plan physician-ranking programs this summer, based on concern that consumers would be directed to certain physicians based solely on cost, not quality.

"Attorney General Cuomo's model ensures transparency for both patients and doctors -- patients will now understand the criteria upon which doctors are ranked, and doctors will be able to provide input into the ranking system," said Robert Goldberg, DO, president of the Medical Society of the State of New York. Dr. Goldberg is a physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist in New York.

The Cigna Care Network designation for the plan's tiered networks is used in 58 markets from Los Angeles to Washington, D.C. At the time it signed its deal with Cuomo, Cigna said it was likely the parties would expand the reach of the agreement to cover its tiered networks nationwide, though it didn't make that announcement immediately.

[...] Copyright 2007 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
RELATED CONTENT  You may also be interested in reading:
Putting the quality in rankings - Editorial Dec. 3
New York agreement refines doctor-rating criteria  Nov. 19
Resistance builds against insurers' tiered networks  Sept. 17
New York warns of lawsuit over physician rankings by United  Aug. 6
Coping with rankings: Still time for challenges  June 18

PHR: Pretty Half-hearted Reception

One doesn't have to look hard to find a personal health record system. A 2006 study by the Markle Foundation found that more than 200 PHR systems are available, and new products are continually being announced. But studies also show that availability is not translating into use, with only about 5% of all patients using PHRs.

Vendors have had a hard time selling the idea of a personal medical diary to healthy consumers who see their doctors maybe once or twice a year. In addition to privacy and security concerns, patients are staying away because the PHRs on the market aren't doing much to entice them, analysts say. The industry also has failed to come up with a convincing argument for why doctors should encourage their use.

But the technology is changing, along with the scope, to make PHRs more attractive. Vendors are reaching out to health plans and employers in hopes of encouraging PHR use through incentives. And expanded data sets make the records more useful to physicians.

PHRs have been welcomed by their original target audience: patients in active treatment and their caregivers, said Peter Waegemann, executive director of the Medical Records Institute, which researches electronic medical record usage and adoption.

But even among early adopters, privacy and security were major concerns, said Cynthia Solomon, founder of Sonoma-Calif.-based FollowMe. One of the first known Internet-based PHRs, FollowMe was launched in 2000 by Solomon, who was caring for her chronically ill son.

[...] Copyright 2007 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
RELATED CONTENT  You may also be interested in reading:
Microsoft's HealthVault is the latest entrant in the PHR arena  Oct. 22/29
Personal health record venture gets new life  Oct. 8
Insurers collaborate on standards for PHRs  Jan. 1/8
An uphill climb for personal health records  Column June 19, 2006

Union-run VEBAs taking charge of corporate health benefits

Physicians are trying to set up meetings with United Auto Workers officials to find out how the union's coming takeover of retiree health benefits from Ford, Chrysler and General Motors might affect them.

But if previous transfers from companies to unions are any indication, physicians should not expect the new managers of retiree benefits to be more generous than the old ones. In fact, a union's takeover of benefits has sometimes resulted in even more aggressive cost-cutting efforts than when the benefits remained under corporate control.

"It's a huge change of mentality," said Matthew Holt, a health care consultant and vice president of research for Emeryville, Calif.-based Professional Service Solutions Inc. "Instead of saying, 'GM, you'd better give us this, this and this,' now [the union says], 'It's our money.' "

With Ford workers represented by the UAW ratifying their new contract on Nov. 14, the automakers will begin fulfilling their commitment to put $54.4 billion -- $32 billion from GM, $13.6 billion from Ford and $8.8 billion from Chrysler -- into the union's Voluntary Employees' Beneficiary Association, or VEBA.

Congress created VEBAs in 1928, and they served as the basis for company sick funds, a precursor to private health insurance. VEBAs are tax-exempt entities, and corporate contributions to VEBAs are also tax-exempt. A VEBA can be funded by more than one employer, but in any case it needs an IRS letter of determination to prove its tax-exempt status.

[...] Copyright 2007 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
RELATED CONTENT  You may also be interested in reading:
UAW, Ford reach tentative agreement on health costs  Jan. 2/9, 2006
Physicians brace for impact of GM's health cost cuts  Nov. 7, 2005

Eating disorders in adolescents

Eating disorders in adolescents Eating disorders in the U.S. among ethnic groups were believed to be rare, but recent studies have shown that a number of cultures are now exposed to the thin beauty ideal. As a result, experts expect to see an increase in eating disorder symptoms among ethnic groups. It is also suspected that eating disorders and weight control behaviors may be increasing among adolescent boys. Eventhough research has shown that eating disorders begin during adolescence, few epidemiological studies have been conducted with teens and those that have examined weight control practices among adolescents are too varied to be able to discern trends.

A new study, one of the first to examine trends in adolescent weight control behaviors over a 10-year period, observed that the prevalence of these behaviors in male adolescents significantly increased, while black females appear to resist pressure to pursue thinness. The study was published online in the International Journal of Eating Disorders (http://www.interscience.wiley.com/journal/eat), the official journal of the Academy for Eating Disorders.

Led by Y. May Chao of Wesleyan University in Middletown, CT, scientists examined data from nationally representative samples of high school students from 1995 to 2005. The data was available via the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS), a survey conducted every two years since 1991 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to assess the prevalence of health-risk behaviors among teens.

The results showed that the prevalence of dieting and diet product use among female adolescents significantly increased between 1995 and 2005 and as did the prevalence of all weight control behaviors (including dieting, diet product use, purging, exercise and vigorous exercise) among males. The data suggested that black female adolescents are the least likely to practice weight control, while white female adolescents are the most likely. Among males, white adolescents are the least likely to practice weight control and Hispanic adolescents are the most likely. The authors suggest that Hispanics may be more motivated to control their weight due to the higher prevalence of overweight among these young men.

The increase in weight control behaviors among males indicates that the social pressure for men to achieve unrealistic body ideals is growing, putting young males at an increased risk of body dissatisfaction and developing an eating disorder, as per the authors. Considering that males have negative attitudes toward therapy-seeking and are less likely than females to seek therapy, efforts should be made to increase awareness of eating disorder symptomatology in male adolescents, and future prevention efforts should target male as well as female adolescents, they state.

The study reported the 10-year trends but also showed that some behaviors fluctuated during this period. The authors suggest that some practices, such as dieting, may be sensitive to changes in certain aspects of culture, such as fashion and topics of media focus, or seasonal variations, since it was not known at what time of year the YRBSS was administered.

Surprisingly, unlike prior studies, the current study did not find that ethnic differences in weight control behavior are decreasing. The authors suggest that black women tend to have more flexible concepts of beauty, which may make them less vulnerable to social pressure. However, this may put them at increased risk for becoming overweight, given the current environment of super-sized portions of nutritionally deficient foods.

The authors conclude, Males, particularly ethnic minority males, are under studied in this field, and this study provides key information about the prevalence of weight control practices in a large, diverse sample of male adolescents and raises important questions about the factors contributing to the ethnic difference in weight control practices among male adolescents.


Posted by: Evelyn    Source

Obesity strongest risk factor for colorectal cancer

Obesity strongest risk factor for colorectal cancer Research presented at the 72nd Annual Scientific Meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology observed that obesity, among other important risk factors, was the strongest risk factor for colorectal cancer in women.

Joseph C. Anderson, MD of Stony Brook University in New York (and the University of Connecticut) and colleagues examined data from 1,252 women who underwent colonoscopy. They classified patients as per their age, smoking history, family history of colorectal cancer, and body mass index (BMI). Obesity was defined as a BMI of 30 or higher. For smoking, patients were divided into three groups: heavy exposure, low exposure, and no exposure. Patients who were in the heavy exposure group included women who had smoked more than 10 pack years and who were currently smoking or had quit in the past 10 years.

Eventhough smoking posed a significant increased risk for colorectal neoplasia, scientists observed that for women, obesity was the highest attributable risk factor for developing the disease. BMI accounted for one-fifth of all significant polyps detected during colonoscopy. Of those patients who had colorectal neoplasia, 20 percent were obese and 14 percent were smokers.

Given the increasing number of obese patients in the U.S., identifying them as high risk may have important screening implications, said Dr. Anderson. While obesity is positively linked to an increased risk of colorectal cancer, patients who lower their BMI could potentially reduce their risk of developing the disease in the future.


Posted by: Evelyn    Source